![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Free
Readers Ensemble
![]() Wm. B. Sullivan Realty & Co. RAVINIA "A Great time in a Wonderful Place" SJC ![]() Adopt a Pet, Come for a Visit ![]() CAGIS Archaeological Consulting Services |
February 15, 2008 Why Doesn't The Media Ask the Tough Questions of Presidential Candidates? by Ed Vincent I am not sure why the voters are being played for dummies, perhaps many are not all that bright, but regardless of your view point, many will still be voting. Would it not be better to structure the debates upon things that matter to the country, as opposed to what television viewers like to hear or talk about (American Idol, American Gladiator, etc...)? President Bush was yelling about Pork projects and add ons to bills, letting one and all know that he will veto any bills with pork built in. Why didn't someone note that all the pork on bills (annually) is less than 1% of the U.S. budget? Barack Obama tells us about change, it has become a mantra, that tone is being repeated by one and all. Why doesn't someone look at the tone and try to decipher its melody, if there is a melody in just a tone? There will be change without any action, the current President, an alcoholic evangelical with speech defects and narrow vision will be gone from all but history (his naïveté will take sometime to clean up-and you only get two terms). When Senator Obama speaks of items other than mere change another favorite is how we are not a divided country between the colors of red and blue, that is to say Republican and Democrat. What kind of platitude is that? If it's a desire for the future, how do we get there? What does it mean? Senator Obama's alma mater, Harvard, has a new study to show how and where the red and blue states differ on health issues and how to finance them. Please keep the discussions active, actual, factual, and meaningful, so all those viewers of analog (digital next year) visual tripe will know who and what they are voting for, other than skin, sex, and smiles. Education
Funding Education GAPS
Illegal Drugs Violence in Inner Cities Death Penalty Illegal Aliens Infrastructure Better Funding for Medical Research (Why not a World project?) Cure Cancers...etc. More Mass Transit More Train Lines Across the Country Instead of Trucks (our current rail lines are almost at capacity) Greener Visions of the Future
NEWS Harvard School of Public Health
Seventy
percent of Republicans think socialized medicine would make things
worse and 70% of Democrats think it would make things better
During the course of the
presidential nomination campaign, some candidates’ health care plans
have been described as ‘socialized medicine’. Historically, the phrase
socialized medicine has been used to attack health reform proposals in
the The poll shows striking differences by party identification. Seventy percent of Republicans say that socialized medicine would be worse than our current system. The same percentage of Democrats (70%) say that a socialized medical system would be better than our current system. Independents are more evenly split with 43% saying socialized medicine would be better and 38% worse.
Click here to see the full survey results. “These results suggest how polarizing the issue of health care will be in the general election,” says Robert J. Blendon, Professor of Health Policy and Political Analysis at the Harvard School of Public Health. “The phrase ‘socialized medicine’ really resonates as a pejorative with Republicans. However, that so many Democrats believe that socialized medicine would be an improvement is an indication of their dissatisfaction with our current system. Independents, who are the key swing group in this election, are split like the country as a whole.” Although a majority of Americans say they understand the phrase socialized medicine (34% very well, 33% somewhat well), about one in three are uncertain what it means (15% not very well, 15% not at all). When offered descriptions of what such a system could mean, only one-third (32%) feel that socialized medicine is a system where “the government tells doctors what to do”. Strong majorities believe that it means that “the government makes sure everyone has health insurance” (79%) and “the government pays most of the cost of health care” (73%). A majority of those surveyed feel that the American health care system already has elements that could be described as socialized medicine. Sixty percent believe that Medicare is socialized medicine, whereas about half (47%) feel that the veterans health care system is socialized medicine. A majority of Americans feel that the front-runners for the Democratic nomination would propose changes that would create a socialized medical system. However, there is a difference between the two remaining Democratic candidates. Sixty-nine percent think that Hillary Clinton would propose a socialized medical system compared to 57% for Barack Obama. Far fewer Americans feel the Republicans would propose a socialized medical system – Mike Huckabee (19%) and John McCain (15%). Compared to seniors (ages 65+), younger adults (ages 18-34) are more likely to view socialized medicine positively (55% vs. 30%). Younger adults are also more likely than seniors to view Medicare as socialized medicine (67% vs. 47%). The uninsured do not view socialized medicine as negatively as those who have health insurance. Only 19 percent of the uninsured think that a socialized medicine system would be worse than our current system while 57 percent think it would be better. Those who currently have health insurance are divided on whether socialized medicine would be better (44%) or worse (41%). "No doubt some Republicans will continue to use the words 'socialized medicine' to attack Democratic health care proposals before and after this November's elections, but these attacks are unlikely to do much damage,” says Humphrey Taylor, Chairman of The Harris Poll®. “Only just over one third of adults think that socialized medicine would be worse than what we have now, and majorities associate the words with popular policies such as Medicare and a government guarantee that everyone has health insurance. Clearly socialized medicine is not the scary bogeyman it used to be."
Click here to see the press release online, including a table showing responses to the question, So far as you understand the phrase, do you think that if we had socialized medicine in this country that the health care system would be better or worse than what we have now?
Methodology This survey is part of the series, Debating Health: Election 2008. The series focuses on current health issues in the presidential campaign. The survey design team includes Professor Robert Blendon, Tami Buhr, John Benson and Kathleen Weldon of the Harvard School of Public Health; and Humphrey Taylor, Scott Hawkins and Justin Greeves of Harris Interactive. This survey was
conducted by telephone within the All sample
surveys and polls are subject to multiple sources of error including
sampling error, coverage error, error associated with nonresponse,
error associated with question wording and response options, and
post-survey weighting and adjustments. The sampling error for both
polls is +/- 3.0% in 95 out of 100 cases for results based on the
entire sample. For results based on a smaller subset, the sampling
error is somewhat larger.
![]() ![]() © Suburban Journals of Chicago Inc. published by Suburban Journals of Chicago Inc. |